Study 2: scholar ideas and activities of Banter

Study 2: scholar ideas and activities of Banter

Success and debate

Study 1 given insight into how university college students define banter and key terms connected with socially aggressive types of communication. Three themes surfaced: thought intent, commitment of stars, and way of interaction which given a starting position to take into account potential differentiating points into the perceptions of communication behaviours.

Initial theme ended up being thought of intention. Consistent with pro-social meanings of banter (Dynel, 2008), the majority of participants (letter = 175) indicated an optimistic belief to the intent of banter (for example. a€?friendly jokinga€? [Male, 20]). There seemed to be a recognition that banter might incorporate teasing behaviours (example. a€?making enjoyable of somebody playfullya€? [Female, 19]), a behaviour frequently associated with bullying (); but the thought intent of a€?making funa€? or teasing in the context of banter had been identified ina positive manner Only four members seen banter from a wholly adverse attitude, featuring just how banter maybe familiar with excuse an anti-social interaction (for example. a€?to validate a comment or actions made which has been offensivea€? [women, 19]). Eleven players supplied blended appraisals for the purpose related to banter, highlighting how intent was not usually very easy to understand (example. Read More